Despite our best efforts (see here and here) it's clear our design skills are pretty limited. We're going to need professional help (with the design too, I hasten to add, before you go and start making your own jokes).
The line I hear a lot is that good tradesman make or break a build. I'm sure that's true (and we'll likely prove it later in this project), but for me, if you get the design 'wrong', then you've lost from day 1. With that in mind, finding a good architect is paramount to the project being a success. The question arises, how do you find a good architect. I have no real answer for that, other than through recommendation. Like anything else in this world, the best relationships are built on trust - if you have someone you trust, and they can recommend an architect (ideally through personal experience of their work) then you're likely on to a winner.
If you can't get a recommendation (and even if you can, these are things worth thinking about), make sure that your architect is on the same wavelength as you in a few areas:
So, eating our own dogfood, we canvassed opinions of friends and relatives. Fortunately, one of our friends (former neighbour) works in the building trade as a carpenter, so was able to recommend a number of contacts he'd worked with directly, and could vouch for their work. Similarly, we could vouch for his judgement, as we'd seen the standards of his own projects (including the extension to his house), so all was good. We approached one of hos recommendations, who turned out to be someone we knew already (connection through my wife's former work). We went through an initial meeting where we discussed our thoughts around the build; our objectives; budget; styles of things we liked and disliked; etc. It went well. We seemed to be aligned in how we thought about things and he got our style and was making suggestions already that we could see would help us make the most of the space. We decided to go ahead, and commissioned him to come up with a design for our two-storey behemoth of a project (OK, in reality, he'd designd much bigger, but hey, this is the internet, everything's exxagerated). We agreed a full end-to-end contract where he'd do all the designs; help us through planning; get the structural and building control elements in place; and liaise with the builder we selected to make sure the build went to plan.
The early stages of the process were relatively painless - he came back a second time to take proper measurements of the whole house so that he could draw out the current plans and elevations; and then went away to sketch out some ideas. It took a few weeks with a few emails pinging backwards and forwards asking questions about styles and confirming some requirements, and at the end, we had two sets of shiny designs to mull over.
While the 'angled' design is super interesting, mulling it over, we decided that the more traditional 'square-backed' design made more sense as it offered better affinity to the garden, more open internal layout that would give us the space and flow to make a truly social family kitchen/living area. We loved the idea of the balcony from the new master-suite, but our architect was quick to caution us that he expected that to be something the planning department at the council were very likely to veto. His take in this was that if we started with a full-on balcony, we could compromise with the council on a juliet balcony, which would still be a nice feature.
All in all, were very pleased with our selection of architect, and the with the designs he's managed to come up with. He's ticked off all of our objectives, and come up with a design that (at least on paper) looks like it will be a great space to live in. On to the trials and tribulations of the planning department.
We've (kind of) decided where we want the walls of this new and improved family home, but what about all the bits that go inside those walls (or outside for that matter)? Time for some inspiration to strike, methinks.
"Made up ground" he said. What on earth is "made up ground", I said. "Expensive..." he replied. Turns out our foundation needs are 'non-standard'.
Clearly Eisenhower was intimately aware of the British local council system when he said 'Plans are nothing; planning is everything'. We have some great designs, but if the planners decide they don't like them (sorry, that they don't 'adhere to planning regulations') they won't make it any further than drawings on a piece of paper.